《化工理論基礎》是一本綜合性刊物，涵蓋了化工理論和應用研究的各個方面，包括運輸現(xiàn)象、表面現(xiàn)象、混合物分離過程、化學反應器設計的理論和方法、組合過程和多功能反應器、流體力學熱學、擴散、化學工藝和儀器、膜工藝和反應器、生物技術(shù)、分散的系統(tǒng)、納米技術(shù)、過程強化、信息建模與分析、節(jié)約能源和資源的過程、清潔環(huán)境的工藝和技術(shù)。《化學工程理論基礎》是一本同行評議的期刊。我們使用單盲同行評審格式。我們的審查小組包括來自11個國家的87名內(nèi)部和外部審查員（63%）。2017年從提交到第一次決定的平均時間為29天，從第一次決定到接受的平均時間為60天。2017年提交稿件不合格率為40%。接受發(fā)表文章的最后決定由總編輯和編委會作出。受邀審稿人如因利益沖突，認為不合格或不能審稿，應及時通知編輯，拒絕邀請。審稿人應以合理、合理的方式清楚地陳述自己的觀點，以便作者可以利用審稿人的論點來改進手稿。必須避免對作者的個人批評。審稿人應在審稿中指出：（1）作者未引用的任何相關(guān)出版作品；（2）以前出版物中報道的任何內(nèi)容，但未給出適當?shù)膮⒖蓟蛞茫唬?）任何實質(zhì)性相似或重疊與其他手稿(發(fā)表或未發(fā)表)的個人知識。

Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering is a comprehensive journal covering all aspects of theoretical and applied research in chemical engineering, including transport phenomena; surface phenomena; processes of mixture separation; theory and methods of chemical reactor design; combined processes and multifunctional reactors; hydromechanic, thermal, diffusion, and chemical processes and apparatus, membrane processes and reactors; biotechnology; dispersed systems; nanotechnologies; process intensification; information modeling and analysis; energy- and resource-saving processes; environmentally clean processes and technologies.Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes 87 reviewers, both internal and external (63%), from 11 countries. The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 29 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 60 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 40%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (iii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.